Home / Testing / Reliability / Solar radiation test (Sa) according to IEC 60068-2-5 and outdoor material degradation

Solar radiation test (Sa) according to IEC 60068-2-5 and outdoor material degradation

Cover image of the article «Solar radiation test (Sa) according to IEC 60068-2-5 and outdoor material degradation»

Outdoor products are not only subject to heat and humidity — they are subject to solar radiation, the fastest and most difficult to simulate material degradation agent. IEC 60068-2-5 (Test Sa) is a test that simulates solar radiation at ground level, used both to evaluate material aging and to evaluate the thermal effects of radiation.

This article explains the Sa test, the parameters that must be recorded, the failure mechanisms according to the material, and the limits of extrapolation from accelerated testing to outdoor life.

1. What questions does solar radiation testing answer?

  • Do plastic materials, paint, rubber, and labels deteriorate (discolor, become brittle, crack, peel) when subjected to radiation?
  • How much does the surface temperature and the temperature inside the device increase due to radiation absorption?
  • Does the device still operate properly during a day/night cycle with strong radiation?
  • Which part is the hottest spot and does it exceed material limits?

Unlike pure temperature tests, radiation acts selectively on material and color: dark, highly absorbent surfaces will be significantly hotter than light-colored surfaces under the same conditions.

2. How is it different from drying naturally in the open air?

Aspect Try Sa in the room Dry outdoors naturally
Control conditions Yes: radiation, temperature, humidity, cycle are all controllable No: depends on weather, season, geographical location
Time Much shorter (weeks/months instead of years) Long, maybe many years
Reproducibility High Low
Represents reality It is necessary to verify the correlation if one wants to infer longevity Highest in terms of agent combination, but difficult to compare
Cost High on equipment, low on time Low on equipment, very high on time
Solar radiation test chamber with lights simulating the solar spectrum
The radiation test chamber simulates the spectrum and intensity of solar radiation under controlled conditions.

3. Three common uses

Purpose How to do it Evaluation criteria
Evaluation of material deterioration Exposing material samples to radiation for long periods of time following a day/night cycle Change in color, gloss, tensile strength, brittleness, surface cracking
Evaluate the thermal effects of radiation Shine radiation on the device, measure temperature at points Surface and interior temperature, difference compared to air temperature
Outdoor gear reviews Combine radiation with day/night cycle and device operation Functions, parameters, local overheating phenomenon

4. Parameters to record

Parameters Why is it important?
Radiation intensity (W/m²) Determine the heat load and material degradation rate
Spectral distribution (wavelength range) UV rays cause more plastic degradation than infrared rays; Different spectra give different results
Light/dark cycle Simulates the day/night cycle, which affects material fatigue and temperature
Chamber temperature or air temperature High temperatures accelerate aging; recording is needed to separate thermal and radiation effects
Relative humidity Humidity combined with radiation and heat can cause accelerated aging
Total radiation dose or exposure time Is the basis for comparison between tests
Sample location and orientation The sample is tilted or flat, and the direction it faces the light source all affects the received dose

Regarding radiation levels, the standard provides levels and spectrum distribution tables for selection; A total radiation level commonly used to simulate peak ground conditions is about 1,120 W/m². Enterprises need to compare the verbatim standards and required documents to choose the right level and application spectrum.

5. Failure mechanism according to material

Materials/details Mechanism Signs
Engineering plastics, equipment shells Decomposition of polymer chains due to UV and oxidation Discoloration, surface chalking, brittleness, cracking
Paint, coating Loss of connection, peeling of layers Peeling, losing shine, revealing foundation
Rubber, gasket Aging, loss of elasticity Hard, cracked, loss of tightness
Labels, ink Discolored, ink flying Unreadable, label peeling off
Screen, polarized layer Decreased clarity, discoloration Reduced contrast, yellowing
Dark details Large radiation absorption, high local temperature Deformation, soft plastic, deterioration of nearby components
The plastic material sample is exposed to simulated radiation in a test chamber
Assessment of material deterioration requires recording the condition before exposure and checking at each time point.

6. Limitations when extrapolating to outdoor lifespan

A word of caution: accelerated radiation testing does not automatically indicate outdoor longevity. To infer, you need:

  1. There is a correlation between the spectrum and radiation intensity in the chamber with the conditions at the location of use.
  2. Consider other factors that coexist outdoors: moisture, salt, dust, heat cycles, and rain.
  3. Considering the mechanism of deterioration: radiation acceleration may trigger a mechanism different from aging over many years outdoors.
  4. There is control data from actual outdoor exposure if you want to give a longevity figure.

Therefore, Sa test results should be interpreted as evidence of radiation resistance under specified conditions, not as conclusions about years of outdoor use.

7. Common errors

  • Do not record the radiation spectrum, only the total strength is recorded — the two tests may be completely different in their effects on the material.
  • Temperature and humidity are not recorded, making it impossible to separate the effects of radiation from the effects of heat/humidity.
  • Only check appearance with the naked eye, omitting deterioration in mechanical properties and slight color changes.
  • Do not place the sample in a representative direction and angle, resulting in different doses received between samples.
  • Infer the life expectancy directly from the test duration, There is no correlation data.
  • There are no photos or control samples, loses the ability to compare.
Plastic sample and control label after solar radiation test
The control sample maintains the same conditions to help assess the level of radiation attenuation objectively.

8. Frequently asked questions

Can Try Sa replace drying outdoors?

Are not. Try Sa shortens the time and controls the conditions, but does not fully reproduce the combination of outdoor agents. The two ways complement each other.

Is Sa testing required for indoor equipment?

Usually not required for indoor use. But it may be necessary if the product is subjected to transportation, storage or temporary use in a sunny location.

Does solar radiation increase device temperature?

Yes, and this is the most important impact on electrical and electronic equipment. Surface temperatures that absorb radiation can be markedly higher than air temperatures.

What radiation level should be chosen?

As required or industry standard, usually corresponds to the maximum conditions at the location of use. It is necessary to compare the standard verbatim and clearly state the selected level.

How long does it take to try Sa?

Depends on target: thermal assessment may require only a few hours at peak irradiance; Material degradation assessment requires cycles lasting many hundreds of hours. There is no common time.

Can the Sa test be combined with the hot humidity test?

Yes, and in reality outdoors there is always both. However, it is necessary to check the equipment capacity and clearly record the procedure, because high humidity affects the lighting system and stability of the chamber.

9. Conclusion

Solar radiation testing is a necessary test for all outdoor products, but it is also a test that is susceptible to overinterpretation. Results are only valid when recording full intensity, spectrum, cycle, temperature, humidity and total exposure time.

Three things to do: write down all seven parameters of the test; Evaluate materials by both visual and mechanical properties testing when necessary; and do not infer outdoor longevity without correlative data.

References

  • IEC 60068-2-5 — Test Sa: Simulated solar radiation at ground level.
  • IEC 60068-1 — General provisions and guidance.
  • IEC 60068-2-9 — Guidelines for solar radiation testing (related guidance document).
  • IEC 60068-2-78 and 2-30 — Hot and humid testing when it is necessary to incorporate outdoor conditions.
  • TCVN 7699-2-5 — Corresponding national version (if any).

Related articles


Discuss further


    Disclaimer

    This article is an interpretive content compiled by us; not legal advice. Enterprises need to compare relevant documents/standards verbatim before applying them to specific products.

    See more: Copyright Policy & Disclaimer by ticforall.com.